Conservapedia

So I've found Conservapedia, the online resource for those who consider Wkipedia to be too liberal. After all, as Steven Colbert once quipped, 'reality has a well-known liberal bias', and we can't have that, of course. Here's what Conservapedia has to say about unicorns:

The existence of unicorns is controversial. Secular opinion is that they are mythical. However, they are referred to in the Bible nine times,^[1] which provides an unimpeachable de facto argument for their once having been in existence.

In the original texts, unicorns go by the Hebrew name Re-em whereas the Greek Septuagint used the name Monokeros.^[2] Unicorn itself is Latin. All three names mean "one horn".

While popularly characterized as a horned member of the horse baramin, it is likely that the unicorn was actually quite unhorselike. One recognized theory is that the unicorn was actually the rhinoceros,^[1] however a growing number of Creation researchers are theorizing that the unicorn was actually a member of the ceratopsian baramin.^[2]

Post-Noachian references^[1] to unicorns have led some researchers to argue that unicorns are still alive today. At the very least, it is likely that they were taken aboard the Ark prior to the Great Flood.

Does anyone wonder anymore why the country is so fucked up?